The campaign behind Brexit is a mirror image of our own Cheeto Jesus out here trying to Make America Great White Again. This entire article is a great rundown but the background is especially important:
To understand why Brexit is, at its heart, about immigration, you need to understand a little about the history of immigration to Britain.
Before the European Union was created in 1993, immigration wasn’t a huge deal in the UK. Net migration — the number of people who move to the UK minus the number of people who move out of it — was less than 100,000 annually. After that, however, things changed.
“Between 1993 and 2014 the foreign-born population in the UK more than doubled from 3.8 million to around 8.3 million,” Oxford researchers Cinzia Rienzo and Carlos Vargas-Silva write. “During the same period, the number of foreign citizens increased from nearly 2 million to more than 5 million.”
This can’t all be laid at the EU’s feet. India and Pakistan are the first and third largest sources of British immigration, respectively. But the EU played a major part, as EU rules restrict the ability of member states to bar migration from other EU member states.
Between 2004 and 2014, when immigration to the UK really took off, the percentage of migrants entering the UK from Europe spiked. It went from a little over 25 percent to a little under 50 percent, which means that Europe has driven a lot of the recent rise in the UK’s immigrant population.
There are basically two reasons for this. First, the EU starting expanding in 2004 to include mostly post-Communist countries in central and eastern Europe. These countries are poorer, which means that when they acceded to the EU, their citizens were more likely to move out of them to find work in richer countries such as the UK. Indeed, Poland is now the second-largest source of immigrants to the UK, just behind India.
As always, misdirection, false promises, and hazy memories played a huge part in convincing (mostly older & white) people that returning Britain back to its former glory as white enclave of prosperity and no crime would be the answer to everyone’s problems. It’s no coincidence that the older you are, the more likely you were to vote in favor of leaving the EU.
It’s a symptom of those “Well, in my day…” conversations and lectures that most of us have heard from a parent or grandparent at some point in our lives. Does this mean old people are racist? No, but nostalgia is a tricky animal, and it’s often misleading.
If you believe things were better when you were younger, were they really better or was life better for you because you were younger? Was the economy great or were you just not paying attention because you were younger and it was of no concern to you? So you’ve decided things should go back to the way they were 40 years ago when everything was great, and your politicians are telling you it’s Western Europeans from poor post-Communist countries out here taking your job and Muslims from faraway brown countries also taking your jobs…and plotting to kill you. The only way to reduce immigration is to leave the EU, even if that means sending your country into a recession of indeterminable severity. You’re trying to make your country better by choosing to make it worse, and most of the people making that decision have either left the job market or will be leaving it soon.
So there are a lot of angry millennials in Britain today looking at the baby boomers like “thanks for wrecking the country,” which feels like a lot of millennials on this side of the pond looking at our own baby boomers like “thanks for doing your best to wreck the country.” And all of us can trace our frustration to white people waxing nostalgic for a Leave It To Beaver era when brown people were kept in their place and everything was so perfect and there were no conflicts and everybody had jobs and bought 2-bedroom houses with a high school diploma. Let’s blame brown people stealing jobs and not corporate greed. Let’s blame brown people plotting to kill you and not the rise of a police state and the sensational nature of newsmedia.
All of this just underlines the importance of voting as a young person and being involved in politics. Pay attention to the world around you and shape it into the world you want to live in for the next 60 years instead of passively allowing it to be shaped for you.
Trump sues the Internet, because he needs money.
He’s filing a suit he can’t win so his cult will give him more cash.
Donald Trump sued Twitter, Facebook, and Google yesterday because he misses being able to shit in America’s face whenever the mood strikes, and because he needs money.
Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced that he will lead a lawsuit over alleged censorship against Twitter, Facebook and Google – three tech companies that removed him from their platforms after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by a mob of his supporters.
The lawsuit will be a class-action, with Trump as the lead plaintiff, claiming that he’s been censored by the companies. He spoke about the legal action from his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey.
“I stand before you this morning to announce a very important… development for our freedom and freedom of speech,” Trump said. “In conjunction with the America First Policy Institute, I’m filing, as the lead class-action representative, a major class-action lawsuit against the big tech giants, including Facebook, Google and Twitter, as well as their CEOs.”
(cont. Fox News)
Fox News is reporting this story to its viewers and readers the way it reports everything else: with half of the truth and a Conservative tilt that builds a false reality in the minds of its consumers. Trump is indeed filing suit and he does indeed feel that his First Amendment rights have been infringed upon, but if Fox News would just say plainly that these suits have zero chance of success, people would be less likely to send Trump money, which is all that orange bastard wants in the first place.
Donald Trump’s entire fundraising strategy is to present himself as a champion of white Conservatives who feel they’ve been silenced. They feel like he’s the only one who’s fighting for them, so they send him — a supposed billionaire in their eyes — money to fight liberals, to fight Democrats, to fight the legal establishment, to fight media elites. Fine, if you want to throw away your money so your champion has enough cash to fight the good fight, that’s your right.
Where’s the good fight though? These are lawsuits for show. They won’t be pursued because they have no chance of winning and Trump hates to lose. From a legal precedent, we just had a ruling on this exact same situation less than two weeks ago, and it was in Florida where Trump filed his lawsuit.
A federal judge on Wednesday blocked a Florida law that would penalize social media companies for blocking a politician’s posts, a blow to conservatives’ efforts to respond to Facebook and other websites’ suspension of former president Donald Trump. The law was due to go into effect Thursday, but in issuing a preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle of the Northern District of Florida suggested that the law would be found unconstitutional.
Speaking of Florida, you can’t sue Facebook or Twitter from Florida. You have to sue them in California. I’m not a legal scholar and I don’t know why that is. I would suspect that a company would choose to set up shop in a state whose legal system was more likely to side with the company should an issue arise. If I’m a gun manufacturer, I’d rather be sued in Texas than in New York because my Texas judges will probably see it my way. Whatever the reasons, we all agree to file suit against Facebook and Twitter in California. When you sign up to use the platform, it says in the Terms of Service that any dispute you have must be filed in California.
It’s a done deal. Case closed, before it’s even open. Courts almost always uphold Terms of Service agreements unless there’s something egregiously illegal or unconstitutional in them, and specifying a jurisdiction in which to file a lawsuit is so commonplace, there’s no court that would even look twice at this filing from Florida. The Terms of Service agreement isn’t suddenly rendered invalid because you don’t like what you agreed to or you didn’t read it. It’s a legally binding contract that you agreed to, and if Trump wanted us to believe even for a second that he would pursue this lawsuit seriously, he would’ve at least bothered to file it in California. It’s so clearly Trump’s latest grift to wring money out of his cult, a way to keep his name trending, and another virtue-signaling tactic to his brainwashed followers that says, “hey…I’m still fighting for you guys.”
But he’s just fighting for his bank account.
Dr. Jill Biden for Vogue
First Lady Dr. Jill Biden covers Vogue this month and the accompanying write up is great.
I don’t feel like I know as much about her as I did about Michelle Obama, because the press were breathlessly reporting on every little Obama Tidbit, but Dr. Jill has firmly had me in her camp since I noticed how often she perfectly matches her gloves to her outfit.
This passage about the Navajo nation made me give her two snaps:
Dr. Biden’s trip to the Navajo Nation was, in fact, her third official visit to the tribal land—a fact that was lost on no one. (Business leader and Navajo advocate Clara Pratte says, “As someone who has worked in this field for a long time, I can tell you: This is not the norm. But it should be the norm.”) Dr. Biden’s last trip was two years ago, when she came to open “the very first cancer-treatment center on any American Indian reservation,” as the Navajo Nation’s first lady, Phefelia Nez, pointed out. Her husband, President Jonathan Nez, added that it was the Navajo Nation that helped put Biden over the top in Arizona, with “60, 70, even 80 percent turnout in some places.” There is a Navajo word, jooba’ii, that sounds like “Joe Biden” and means compassion, he said. “That’s how a lot of our elders remembered it at the polls.”
How about that. She’s the real deal.
Also: I love that this photo of Dr. Jill and her grandchildren from a couple of years ago pops up again. Annie Liebovitz did some good work here.
WaPo: 21 House Republicans vote against awarding Congressional Gold Medal to all police officers who responded on Jan. 6
Twenty-one House Republicans on Tuesday voted against awarding the Congressional Gold Medal to all police officers who responded to the Jan. 6 violent attack on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob.
The measure passed the House with overwhelming bipartisan support from 406 lawmakers. But the 21 Republicans who voted “no” drew immediate condemnation from some of their colleagues, and the vote underscored the lingering tensions in Congress amid efforts by some GOP lawmakers to whitewash the events of that day.
Imagine facing down an angry mob and putting your life on the line for a group of people who largely look past you day to day, and then having those people say “oh it wasn’t that bad” and refuse to give you recognition.
The way I would CUSS them out to their FACE. The GOP has no floor. Their party is in hell.
99% of COVID deaths in the US are unvaccinated.
The Tokyo Olympics are a showcase of men behaving badly.
Hot Takes: Black Widow
How to discuss Bill Cosby with Bill Cosby apologists.
Take this Jim Crow era literacy test for Black people.
99% of COVID deaths in the US are unvaccinated.
Race1 year ago
How to respond to “riots never solve anything!”
LGBT11 months ago
Niecy Nash ties the knot with singer Jessica Betts.
Pop Culture2 years ago
Today I Learned: Betty White Gave Arthur Duncan His Start
Race12 months ago
Why don’t we say “Ebonics” anymore?
LGBT1 year ago
Valentina Sampaio, Sports Illustrated, and trans women under the male gaze.
On Television1 year ago
The story behind Hottie and that microwaved chicken.
LGBT7 years ago
A lesson on what bisexuality means and what it doesn’t.
Pop Culture2 years ago
Aubrey O’Day is a blowup doll and I love it.