Connect with us

Politics

Migrant children at the border, a breakdown.

This could be an assumption on my part, but I feel like there’s a lot of confusion around what is actually happening at detention centers, where they come from, what they’re for, etc. I was unclear, so I assume a lot of people are unclear, but we all have the same basic opinion — it’s wrong to keep people (esp. children) in cages. So, I wanted to make a quick breakdown so we all know what happens to kids who come to the border alone, kids who come with their parents, and the differences between those situations under Obama and now under Trump.

Published

on

This could be an assumption on my part, but I feel like there’s a lot of confusion around what is actually happening at detention centers, where they come from, what they’re for, etc. I was unclear, so I assume a lot of people are unclear, but we all have the same basic opinion — it’s wrong to keep people (esp. children) in cages.

So, I wanted to make a quick breakdown(***) so we all know what happens to kids who come to the border alone, kids who come with their parents, and the differences between those situations under Obama and now under Trump.

A child at the border with their family, under Obama.

Most children cross the border with a family member, usually a parent. When they’re captured by ICE or head to an immigration center or port of entry, they’re either illegally crossing the border (“we just want to get into the US”) or they’re seeking asylum (“we’re running from a country where crime in our area is so rampant that either we or our kids are in immediate danger”).

The Obama administration actually established these family detention centers in order to keep children with their parents while their immigration requests were processed. (x) Back in 2013/2014, the US saw a spike in foreign nationals crossing the border illegally and the Obama administration was not prepared for the overflow. So, they set up these facilities that…weren’t great. Many of them violated a previous statute (the Flores agreement) concerning how and for how long migrant children could be detained.

A compromise of sorts was made called the Alternatives to Detention program, which technically still exists under Trump. Instead of holding a family, ICE would release the family under strict monitoring requirements, sometimes in the form of an ankle monitor on one of the parents (mom, most of the time). The family could stay together while their immigration case was processed but they wouldn’t be locked up in a detention facility. (The Trump administration is now using this program to deport instead of simply to track.) (x)

Asylum seekers tended to be treated better than everyone else. If you’re running from threat of violence or death, you and your family were more likely to be kept together and/or released under the Alternatives program. For everyone else, they were more likely to be held in a detention center and prosecuted for the crime of crossing the border illegally, but since that was a violation of the kids’ rights according to Flores, more of those families would be separated to get the kids out of those centers and into homes with another relative or foster situation while their parents’ cases progressed.

There’s also a general practice that kids under a certain age aren’t separated from their families. If you’re under five, they do everything they can to keep the family together until some kind of resolution is decided.

A child at the border alone, under Obama.

These kids are almost always seeking asylum because parents don’t send their minors on a dangerous journey hundreds or thousands of miles just for the heck of it or just because America is “the land of opportunity.” They send their children away from danger toward safety. These kids are almost always older children because parents don’t send their young kids on a dangerous journey without them.

Those children end up in family detention centers (the ones with the cages) — for no longer than three days — and then transferred to a shelter facility until they can be placed with a family member, sponsor, or foster home. A lot of these children have some kind of contact in the US, though sometimes that contact is also an undocumented immigrant. The Office of Refugee Resettlement takes care of unaccompanied minors and the ORR is part of the Department of Health and Human Services, not the Department of Homeland Security which is over ICE. Since ORR has no relation to ICE, they don’t care about the immigration status of the person who comes forward to claim any of those children. They just want to make sure the child is safe and ideally with someone they know. After the child is settled, they do a few checkins to make sure everything is okay, and then they’re on their own.

Summary – Obama

Republicans are not wrong when they say these detention centers operated under Obama, but they mischaracterize them by making it seem like it was the law or even common policy to separate families from their children. Every effort was made to keep families and children together, though the centers themselves were under heavy criticism at the time because it’s inhumane to keep people in cages.

A child at the border with their family, under Trump.

Children are stolen from their parents as a matter of routine, and there’s no other way to say it. They’re taken away while parents are told that the kids are just going to receive a bath. The parents don’t know that they may never see their child again and they don’t know where their child is going. Officially, “tender aged” children (kids under five or so) are supposed to be kept with their families, but we have infants under one year old being taken away from their parents even when that parent is seeking asylum. (x) There’s no compassion or humanity being employed here at all, as we saw last night when one of Trump’s former minions “womp-womped” about a little girl with Down’s Syndrome being taken away from her parents. (x)

Families can also request asylum to be kept together while their case is processed, but that hasn’t been working recently either.  There’s a lawsuit right now (Ms. L v. ICE) where a 7 year old girl from the Congo was taken from her mother even though the mom requested asylum. (x) The Trump administration is using the Flores agreement and policies in place under the Obama administration to say that they are legally required to separate children from their parents, and that’s simply not true because the Obama administration made every effort to keep families together when possible. The Trump administration is making every effort to separate them.

Kids that are taken by immigration officials end up in a detention facility (the cages) before ORR places them in a shelter to ostensibly be passed along to a relative, sponsor, or foster. Under Obama, most of the kids being sent to ORR for placement were older kids over 13 because those kids were unaccompanied minors. Now, since the Trump administration is taking kids and babies from their parents, ORR has to house younger children they weren’t previously equipped to handle. Some of the facilities have had to be updated quickly to handle small children and babies.

Trump’s new zero tolerance policy is what really kicked this into high gear in May, not anything under the Obama administration. Zero tolerance means that we don’t care why you came, you’re going to be treated as a criminal for illegally crossing the border. (x) Never before did we prosecute first-time asylum seekers, but now, everybody is the same and then maybe we’ll figure out why you came.  So, the kids are separated from their “criminal” parents – because they can’t be left in their care when the parent is being prosecuted by the federal government – and the parents are placed in lockup. The kids are placed in a different lockup. Up to 90% of parents are having their children taken away from them, and the rest of those are mothers who are going with their kids to the family detention facilities.  The other parents are going to adult jails to wait on their cases to be processed, which can take four to six weeks. Meanwhile, they can’t get in touch with their kids, don’t know where their kids are, and may never see them again because some of these parents are being deported without their children.  The children are now under the care of ORR and the process to release them back to their parents is so complicated and convoluted that it sometimes depends on the child to prove that their parent is their parent. We have five-year-olds — under stress — being asked their parents full names and dates of birth in order to be released back to those parents before mom & dad are deported.  And a lot of them can’t do it, so now they’re “unaccompanied minors” dumped into the foster system. (x)

So why don’t we give the kids IDs?  Well, the Department of Homeland Security gives them an alien ID number or wristband, and then turn them over to ORR (the Department of Health and Human Services) which sends them to temporary housing in places like NYC (this morning someone caught video of migrant children entering and leaving a foster care in East Harlem).  Meanwhile, the parents are still the responsibility of Homeland Security and being sent to jails to await immigration trials in other cities.  You have two different government departments keeping track of different family members in different cities — it’s a complete mess.

A child at the border alone, under Trump.

Nothing has really changed on the front end — they go to ORR – but now ICE is getting involved in the placement of the kids.  Whereas before, ORR never cared about the immigration status of the adults coming to pick up the kids, this administration wants to extend the background checks to immigration status, which will obviously deter many undocumented adults from retrieving their nieces, nephews, grandkids, kids of friends, etc. who were sent here alone to escape the violence of their home country. They won’t step forward to collect the kids because they might be deported, which means there are more kids who have nowhere to go when they get here. (x)

Summary

Trump took a complicated situation and made it more stressful with a zero tolerance policy toward all immigrants crossing the border. The Obama administration had a system in place that had a lot of faults — detention centers being the biggest one, obviously — but they operated from a place of doing what’s best for the children, even when misguided.

See, the reason why Obama was deaf to the criticism brought against his centers was his view that having women and children (or children alone) being sent to these “jails” with the cages would be a deterrent for other families who considered sending mothers with kids (or kids alone) to the US. He said the journey was dangerous for them and he wanted to staunch the flow of immigrants. Basically look what awaits you when you get here — it’s not great, stay where you are because his reading of the facts at the time was that the journey was more dangerous than the situation they were running from. Obviously that’s the wrong tactic because, even if your kid ends up in a cage for a few days, it’s still better than the rape or murder you’re trying to protect them from or the arduous journey ahead of them. (x)

The Trump administration wants to keep everybody out. If you come here — I don’t care who you are or your situation — your kid will be stolen from you and then you’ll be deported and never see them again. Asylum doesn’t matter. Family doesn’t matter. Age of the child doesn’t matter. We are going to separate you, put your kid in a cage, and then send you back to where you came from without your child.

As I was writing this, Trump says he’s going to sign some executive order to stop separation of families at the border (x), but it’s not even needed. They’ve created a narrative where Obama forced the separation of families, Trump is simply following the law, the Democrats refuse to change that law, and now Trump will swoop in with his pen to keep those families together. Trump thought he could leverage forced separation against getting funding for his wall, but even the Republicans in Congress didn’t go for it, so he’s stuck with this massive problem that he created in order to look tough on immigration.

Sidenote about missing children.

A few weeks ago, different numbers went viral concerning the number of missing kids that had been lost by the government after crossing the border. The number has always been misleading, but this is a good time to remind you that there were two separate groups of kids initially – unaccompanied minors and kids separated from their families.  The unaccompanied minors were taken in by ORR and then placed. And that’s it. We don’t always keep track of them after that because they’ve been picked up by a friend or family member or they were placed with the person they came to meet. You don’t actually want more government oversight here because it will lead to a lot of deportations under this administration.  Once the kid is safe in a home, we don’t need to follow their every move.  We don’t actually know where they are, but they’re not missing as characterized by all the viral posts.

The kids who are missing are the ones forcibly separated by ICE and then lost. When ICE separates a family, some of them go to ORR and then placed and then we longer keep track of them. Some of them are legitimately lost and end up in terrible situations like sex trafficking. That is the part that needs more oversight – where are the kids going when they leave ICE.

There is a third – smaller – group of kids that are placed by ORR that we can’t find and that’s because the people they were placed with don’t always want any further contact with the government. When ORR calls to check on the whereabouts of a kid, they just call. If no one answers, then the kid isn’t found. That missed call could be the result of changing a phone number, moving, or undocumented immigrants who don’t want to talk to the government any more than necessary. So, we don’t know where those kids are exactly, but they were most likely released to the care of a family member initially and they’re probably still fine. (Probably isn’t the ideal situation, but I’m of the notion that it’s still better than having ORR work with ICE to keep track of every child indefinitely.) (x)

Unfortunately, this administration has now classified all of the kids the same way, so it looks like the kids lost by the Department of Homeland Security are the same as the kids who are just no longer being tracked by the Department of Health and Human Services. They’re not the same though. Some were lost by the system and some were released by the system and left alone to live their lives in the care of whoever they were released to.

(***) This ended up not being a quick breakdown.  My bad.)

facebook.com/SoLetsTalkAbout/
twitter.com/RafiDAngelo
Email: rafi@soletstalkabout.com
Venmo: Rafi-DAngelo
CashApp: $RafiDAngelo
paypal.me/soletstalkabout

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Politics

Eric Adams is off to a great start!

We could have had Maya Wiley 🙁

Published

on

And I mean that. If we expect a certain level of incompetence or corruption from our New York City Mayors, then Eric Adams has gone far and beyond my expectations of either.

great /ɡrāt/ adj.
of an extent, amount, or intensity considerably above the normal or average

The intensity of the disaster that is Mayor Adams is considerably above the norm.


I currently have the easiest job I’ve ever held. This week is busy because my boss is away and I still only know about 70% of the things I need to know in order for my department to run smoothly, but it’s not hard. I’m sitting on my couch typing this right now. When I finish, I’ll log back into the system, turn on some music, and keep troubleshooting problems until 6.

If I need the day off, I’ll send a message to my boss (or her boss) on Slack and let them know. Today I started working at 8, because I was up anyway, and I scheduled two one-hour breaks for myself. I didn’t ask anybody for their permission. I haven’t showered yet, because I want to twist my hair and I’ll do that this evening. I have a saucer in front of me with crumbs from a couple of chocolate chip cookies I was nibbling on. It’s 20 degrees outside, and I only know that because there’s a weather tracker at the bottom of my screen.

When I worked in the mall, I was standing up for 8 to 10 hours a day. It was recommended that you buy comfortable shoes. You had to arrive ten minutes before your shift, 20 degrees or not, so you could put on all your gear, stuff your outerwear in a locker, and make sure your walkie worked. If you had to pee, someone not much older than you had to give you permission. If you were thirsty, someone not much older than you had to give you permission. If it was time for your scheduled lunch, someone not much older than you had to make sure the last person was back from lunch before you could clock in. If it was time for you to leave, someone not much older than you had to give you permission to clock out. I was written up for having M&Ms in the drawer under my cash register once. I sprained my ankle and had to beg my co-workers to cover my shifts so I wouldn’t be fired for not coming to work on crutches.

I did all of that while being disrespected and talked down to by customers. An old white lady told me I looked like “a fuckin poodle” because I wouldn’t honor a coupon that expired during the Carter administration. Everyday I had to walk a very stressful line between being nice while also abiding by company policy. Too far into nice, and it’s a write up for breaking a rule. To far into company policy, and it’s a write up for not making the customer’s day. And my paycheck was a quarter of what it is now.

So when Eric Adams tried to convey his support for the Workers formerly known as Essential, I bristled.

Listen, I know what he was trying to say. I also know he needs somebody around him to help him say it better. In the words of Sophia Petrillo, “your heart’s in the right place but I don’t know where the hell your head is.”


Eric Adams, a cop who loves cops and guns, does not believe in travelling around the city with a security detail. He says cops keep the city safe and he’ll be fine walking around the city with his gun and the admiration of his citizens.

Well, that’s what he said during his campaign anyway. As with any politician who cannot be trusted, he’s reversed course and used his personal security as an excuse to hire his brother into a $240,000 position as deputy commissioner of the NYPD.

“Number one, he will be in charge of my security, which is extremely important to me at a time when we see an increase in white supremacy and hate crimes,” Adams told Jake Tapper Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.

(cont. NBC New York)

I love a convenient white supremacy soundbyte. The NYPD is a white supremacist organization that takes joy in terrorizing Black and brown communities. I remember stop & frisk, a policy Eric Adams supports. You can’t have it both ways. Either you’re afraid of white supremacy or you’re working within a system to uphold it.

Besides, Eric Adams made his assertion that he doesn’t need security detail on January 30th — that’s three weeks after the Koup Klutz Klan tried to overthrow the government. If you weren’t worried about white folks in the aftermath of that, you are certainly not concerned about white supremacy when it’s time to give your brother, who was the director of a parking garage, a cozy post at the NYPD to accompany you to events and collect a fat paycheck.


I got a message early yesterday morning.

I didn’t see it until the afternoon, because I turn off my notifications at night and I forgot to turn them on while I working, but I had no idea there was a fire. I live in Harlem and I’m not sure I know anyone who lives in the Bronx, so it wouldn’t be neighborhood news, but I looked it up.

The mayor of New York City, Eric Adams, on Monday revised the death toll from a high-rise fire in the Bronx on Sunday, saying 17 people were killed, two fewer than originally thought.

Adams said nine adults and eight children died. He did not immediately provide a reason for the lower count.

Investigators determined that a malfunctioning electric space heater started the fire in the 19-storey building.

(cont. The Guardian)

There are instances when a space heater is necessary, but for the most part, low income residents in NYC buy a space heater when the building they live in is too cold. And the building is too cold because the heat isn’t working properly or the windows are broken. Some of the most common complaints against low income housing in NYC are related to broken windows and no heat or hot water. This is true for Twin Peaks, the building in question, as well.

It’s important to note that most people do not actually file complaints until the situation becomes unlivable. If you see three apartments with NO heat, that’s another twenty apartments with LOW heat whose residents just get through the winter. Sometimes they don’t want to file a complaint because they don’t have time to sit around and wait for service. Sometimes they’ve filed before and the hassle to fix it was worth more effort than just leaving it broken the next time. Sometimes they’re afraid to file because they’re afraid problem tenants won’t have their lease renewed. This past summer, our hot water went out 7 or 8 times, and we only complained twice because getting our landlord to fix anything is a part time job in itself.

This building also lacked sprinklers throughout most of the structure. In NYC, commercial buildings must have sprinklers, but legislation to require sprinklers in residential buildings has faced strong opposition from landlords who say it will cost too much to update older buildings.

(cont. NYT)

So we have a low-income building without sprinklers where residents are using space heaters because it’s not warm enough. Buildings just like it are all over the city, but what does that have to do with our new mayor?

(cont. The City)

A landlord who doesn’t have sprinklers in his high rise buildings shouldn’t be helping to guide an administration through housing policy. We need an administration who wants to invest in public safety, not one being led by landlords who own firetraps.

We are less than two weeks into Eric Adams as Mayor, and from looks of it, it’s going to be a long four years. For me, a leader doesn’t have to have all the answers. What I’m really looking for is someone smart enough to know their limitations, someone who can effectively communicate with the public, someone who shares my goals and values, and someone who seeks out the best in their field to bring their expertise to the variety of issues facing any community.

 

facebook.com/SoLetsTalkAbout/
twitter.com/RafiDAngelo
Email: rafi@soletstalkabout.com
Venmo: Rafi-DAngelo
CashApp: $RafiDAngelo
paypal.me/soletstalkabout

Continue Reading

News

Rockstar Rittenhouse

If you enjoy celebrating a murderer, that’s just who you are as a human being. And I don’t respect you.

Published

on

Kyle Rittenhouse gets a rock star reception at the Turning Point USA event in AZ.

The teen was found not guilty of criminal charges after admitting to shooting & killing two people in WI. He says it was self defense.

He’s now seen as a hero by some activists on the right.

(Twitter: Elex Michaelson)

I don’t really understand what’s happening. And I don’t mean that in the sense that I’m surprised or that I didn’t see it coming. We all said that Kyle Rittenhouse’s acquittal would become a cause célèbre for the Right. He had sponsorship offers before the trial and congressional internship offers during. He’s been celebrated by Conservatives from the moment he was arrested because he’s a symbol of White America’s fight against change, a visual representation of what can happen if you are brave enough to stand up to the forces conspiring to take Amerikkka from you.

I fully understand that, so this is not a surprise at all.

I guess what I don’t fully grasp is how am I supposed to respect these people in any way? Listen y’all, I was already at the end of my rope. Trump’s election in 2016 taught me that some people are irredeemable. Before that, I generally operated on the premise that most people, even people you do not agree with politically, are not inherently evil and that you can find common ground somewhere because we’re all people. 2016 taught me that, no, some people cannot be helped, saved, or taught.

You cannot force someone to have empathy for other people. I cannot teach someone they need to care about what happens to people outside of their perceived tribe. If you think poor people deserve to die because you feel like they didn’t work hard enough, I cannot fix that. If you think drug addicts deserve to die because you feel like they made a choice to become addicted, I cannot fix that. If you think undocumented immigrants deserve to die in their own countries (that the US made unstable) because we have our own problems at home (that you refuse to address), I cannot fix that.

Still, there was a little space left in my psyche for ignorance, misinformation, and the insular nature of social circles with a feedback loop of confirmation bias. I spent a lot of the summer in the rural Deep South while my dad and stepmom recovered from a car accident. I heard the conversations and watched the local news. Part of me feels like it’s not 100% your fault if you believe poor people are amoral and lazy. That’s what you’ve heard from your politicians, your family, your friends, your neighbors, your church, and the news. I’ll be honest: a lot of my belief system has been reinforced, if not outright formed, by the variety people around me. Ten years ago, I was making transphobic jokes. Five years ago, I was called out for fatphobia on Twitter. These are issues I didn’t know I harbored negative sentiments about, things that I quickly evolved my thinking around because the people around me called me out on it and forced me to reexamine how I felt and why I felt that way, intentionally or not. All that is to say, I get it. I understand being a product of your environment.

I don’t understand celebrating murderers. George Zimmerman signs bags of Skittles for his fans. Kyle Rittenhouse is introduced at events with a production worthy of a Wrestlemania top draw. Killing someone should be traumatic. If I had to kill someone in self defense, I would have to go to therapy for a long time to work through that trauma. I wouldn’t be able to be celebrated. I wouldn’t know how to book jovial interviews to laugh about what kinds of women I like. I wouldn’t know how to sit on stage and give life advice as a teenager who has never accomplished anything other than murder.

I don’t know how to respect people who celebrate death. And that’s not to say that I find life all that sacred, because I’ve gone on record many times saying I don’t. Not really. There are 7 billion of us. Seven billion of anything means a singular one of it isn’t that special, to me. But dead people have families and friends and loved ones who are hurting, and I don’t know how to respect people who revel in the pain of others. I understand not necessarily caring. I can understand dismissiveness. Outright celebration though is so beyond anything I can relate to. What kind of person are you that you would cheer for someone whose only claim to fame is looking for a fight and getting one? What am I supposed to say to these people? I’m so disgusted by their existence I can barely put my feelings into words.

There’s no part of me that could ever be in the same room with a Republican. This is who they are as a group of people. They are a political party whose guiding principle is “sticking it to the Libs” by any means necessary. If it makes the opposition upset, that makes them happy.

Wearing a mask is not hard. Getting a vaccine is not controversial. But Republican politicians, who are vaccinated and wear masks when no one is looking, just want to upset the opposition.

Singular They is not hard. We have been using they/them/theirs as a pronoun to describe the notion of an unspecific person forever. But Republican politicians have decided it’s the downfall of society to apply it to a specific person who asks for that pronoun.

Celebrating murder is wrong. Even murder in self-defense is seen as a tragedy. But Republicans want to use Kyle Rittenhouse to gloat. They’re turning a teenaged murderer into a rockstar to stick it to the Libs. That space I had left in my psyche to allow for ignorance and misinformation is gone. This isn’t about being ill-informed. They’re just bad people. And I can’t teach someone how not to be a bad person.

If you enjoy celebrating a murderer, that’s just who you are as a human being. And I don’t respect you.

 

facebook.com/SoLetsTalkAbout/
twitter.com/RafiDAngelo
Email: rafi@soletstalkabout.com
Venmo: Rafi-DAngelo
CashApp: $RafiDAngelo
paypal.me/soletstalkabout

Continue Reading

Politics

Minnesota has a nice preview of the 2024 election.

The GOP is standing firm on the “stolen election” rhetoric, so be prepared.

Published

on

Minnesota is gearing up for their gubernatorial election next year and the Republican candidates had a little debate last week. Because Minnesota is widely known as a barometer for the political climate of the country and because I deeply care about what is going on in the Minnesota GOP, I watched their debate in order to gain a greater understanding of the direction in which our country is headed.

What really happened is, I saw someone say on Twitter say that nobody on the panel would unequivocally admit that Biden won the election.

So I decided to watch only that part of the debate just to see what the rhetoric was looking like and y’all — I’m so sick of them it made me chuckle.

Start at 10:11

The moderator says, “In your opinion did President Biden win a constitutional majority of the Electoral College? If yes, how did you come to your conclusion, and if no, which states are in dispute and why?”

This guy asked a panel of politicians to give an opinion on a factual statement. Uncle Joe won a constitutional majority of the Electoral College. Period. There was no fraud. This has been debunked around the planet.

Guy 1 answers: I don’t know and we have to take that attitude toward 2020. We have to take the attitude that we don’t know the results of a president election?

Guy 2 answers: This is not unique to 2020. Oh? Y’all stole 2016, is that what you’re saying? Because you won that election, so does it apply every cycle or only when the Democrats win? In Minnesota our dictator governor went around to the legislature to weaken what defenses we did have for voter integrity. Do I think that played a role? How could it not? I would like to remind y’all that in Minnesota, Republicans won the Senate. Amazing how voter fraud only applies to votes cast for Democrats.

Guy 3 answers: Don’t let me vote Democrat when I die (laughs from the audience). Because we’re going with this lie that a bunch of dead people voted. I do believe there was voter fraud at a massive scale across this country. And where is the evidence? A massive scale should show more than just a couple of pockets of  Maybe This, Maybe That over a few hundred votes. A massive scale means hundreds of thousands of instances of fraud. We need to enforce the laws we already have and prosecute the people committing voter fraud (claps from the audience). Nobody is getting in trouble. Let’s note here that “nobody is getting in trouble” largely applies to Republicans, like this Trump voter in Pennsylvania who got probation while this woman in Texas (voting for Hillary in 2016) who  did not know she wasn’t allowed to vote while on probation got five years in jail. We need people who feel disenfranchised to show up like they did in 2022 when they took Virginia back and elected Youngkin and we can take back the House here in Minnesota. Yes, white Conservatives are so disenfranchised. Their representation in Congress isn’t outsized in proportion to their population makeup in any way whatsoever.

Guy 4 answers: I don’t think the election was fair but we have the results that we have and the Electoral College is the way that we determine the election. Each state has their own deal and I’m not a fan of how it all played out, but I’m focused on Minnesota. Is this an argument for doing away with the electoral college? Because I wholeheartedly support that, Guy Whose Name I Will Not Bother To Look Up. 

Lady 5 answers: …be an election judge, be a poll watcher. The more we watch, the less they cheat. She did not answer the question directly, because she probably knows Biden won the election but she doesn’t want to say so because that is political suicide in the Republican Party right now. So the moderator asks again: Did Biden win? He was certified by Congress as having won the Electoral College. That is a political answer if ever I did see one.

So, that’s where we are y’all. The Republicans who believe with their whole chest that the election was rigged or stolen have made that part of their plan to force voting restrictions, and the ones who may have a single brain cell left are too afraid to admit that they have one lest they be cast out of the big ignorant tent erected by the GOP.

Make your voting plan early. Dot your i’s and cross your t’s. Help your older family members register and assist in gathering documents to make sure they have an ID. You can even find the election dates on your calendar and plan to take off work that day. Whatever you need to do to prepare for the shenanigans, go ahead and start putting those processes in place because the GOP is only going to get worse.

 

facebook.com/SoLetsTalkAbout/
twitter.com/RafiDAngelo
Email: rafi@soletstalkabout.com
Venmo: Rafi-DAngelo
CashApp: $RafiDAngelo
paypal.me/soletstalkabout

Continue Reading

Trending

%d bloggers like this: